Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-09-03-Speech-2-131"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-09-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020903.5.2-131"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-09-03-Speech-2-1322
lpv:speaker	lp:Malmström, Paulsen and Olle Schmidt (ELDR )2
lpv:translated text	"We have chosen to vote against Mr Stevenson’s report in its entirety. There is no justification for the committee’s taking the ban on processing animal protein in animal feed as a pretext for demanding EU subsidies for lupins – would you believe – and other protein-rich crops. Equally unjustified is the demand for a ‘safety net’ or income-insurance scheme to benefit producers of oilseed and protein crops. According to the committee, the Commission’s solution of using the world market almost exclusively, would make the EU vulnerable, ‘particularly to climate change, harvest failures and even price increases from the main global suppliers (USA, Argentina and Brazil)’. We see nothing wrong or unnatural about that. On the contrary. As liberals, we believe in globalisation, free trade and international solidarity. We cannot therefore support Mr Stevenson’s report."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph