Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-07-03-Speech-3-206"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20020703.7.3-206"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
"As the author is not present, Question No 2 lapses. Question No 3 by Alexandros Alavanos , which has been taken over by Mihail Papayannakis (): At the Nice Summit, the '15' decided that only Member States of the European Union would take part in the planning of operations by the European military force, regardless of whether NATO facilities were used. This last and unique decision by the European Union met with a vehement reaction from Ankara, which threatened to use its veto in NATO if it did not participate on an equal footing with the Member States in taking the relevant decisions. There then followed an 'extra-institutional' Anglo-American initiative which gave rise to the 'Ankara text', which is opposed the letter and the spirit of the Nice decisions. Is the 'Ankara text', which was drawn up outside EU and NATO procedures, binding on the European Union? On the basis of which EU decision are its Presidency and the High Representative exerting pressure on Member States to accept the 'Ankara text'?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"Subject: Revocation of Nice decisions on European military force"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph