Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-07-02-Speech-2-254"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020702.10.2-254"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"On a point of order, Mrs Jackson's question No 67 should have been taken with this. Perhaps if Mrs Jackson comes in there will be time for her to ask a supplementary because the two are on the same issue.
I should like to ask the Commissioner whether Mr McHugh, the owner of the
has applied to use the EU-Mauritanian fisheries agreement? The
and the
are landing in Las Palmas. Since the
is now a flag-of-convenience vessel, what is the Commission doing to stop the
from offloading in Las Palmas?
When you mention the reduction of capacity in the Irish fleet, you are overlooking the fact that the
is the reduction and that it has now gone to a flag-of-convenience country where it can fish without any controls whatsoever. I thought the Commission was going to come down hard on this whole issue.
Quite frankly, you have not answered the question by Mr McCartin in relation to the fact that you have taken legal action against Ireland on two counts, one of which concerned the registration of this vessel. It was registered as a merchant marine vessel and then given a fishing licence. The Irish Government was wrong and now Mr McHugh has found ways to get around the Commission to basically facilitate himself. As far as I can see, the registration problem still stands because it is now in the fleet but it was irregular to begin with."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples