Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-13-Speech-4-110"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-06-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020613.4.4-110"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-06-13-Speech-4-1112
lpv:speaker	lp:Färm, Hedkvist Petersen, Hulthén, Hans Karlsson and Theorin (PSE )2
lpv:translated text	"We voted ‘no’ in the final vote on this report, in spite of there being certain parts of it which improved the Commission proposal, including the new chapter on the important socio-economic impact assessments and the somewhat larger reduction in fishing effort with regard to sand eel and whiting. We nonetheless believe, however, particularly against the background of the very necessary programme, recently presented by the Commission, for reforming the common fisheries policy, that, on quite a few points, this report is unfortunate in the way it forestalls the overall view of this reform that is required. On this basis, we think it particularly unfortunate that the report states that the compensation to be paid to those fishermen and ship owners hit by a temporary cessation of activity “shall be fully paid by the EU”. That is inappropriate in the way it sets in stone a certain approach when it comes to structural measures, and we believe that the Commission proposal, which recommends the co-funding of such compensation, is quite clearly to be preferred."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph