Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-12-Speech-3-331"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020612.3.3-331"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Our broadly favourable vote does not overlook the concern still felt by many of us, where the Sixth Framework Programme is concerned, to see that crucial ethical guarantee clauses are ensured in good time. We also feel that these should be definitively established and clarified when the Specific Programmes are finally approved. Hence the way we have voted on certain amendments. It is worth pointing out that we share the concerns that have been expressed on this matter, particularly by the governments of Germany, Austria, Ireland, Italy and Portugal. Furthermore, we still feel it is unacceptable that monies from a certain country (and its taxpayers) in which various actions are illegal could, as a result of the European mechanism, ultimately be used to finance these same actions when undertaken in another Member State. Let us remember the way in which we defended the principle of legislative unanimity in the Fiori and Caudron reports and we hope that the essence of this defence of basic ethical principles and of respect for the various national legal systems will prevail on the final decisions of the Council."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples