Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-06-11-Speech-2-212"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-06-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Green Paper on consumer protection/Contamination of food by nitrofen2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020611.11.2-212"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-06-11-Speech-2-2132
lpv:speaker	lp:Ria Oomen-ruijten2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Temporary committee on foot and mouth disease (2002-01-17--2002-12-17)3 unknown; Christen Democratisch Appèl (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"I do not want to enter into the discussion of large and small countries. However, I have two specific questions. Did I hear the Commissioner correctly when he said that we have actually known since June 2001 from inspectors that nitrofen had been found. Why did rapid alert not work? This is my first question. My second question concerns the assertion of consumer protection. In my view, this presupposes strong and independent consumer protection organisations. Especially in consideration of the nitrofen scandal, this also presupposes additional measures, particularly with a view to new countries joining. What will the Commissioner do about supporting strong and independent organisations in the candidate countries? I would be interested to find out."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph