Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-05-30-Speech-4-066"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-05-30"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020530.6.4-066"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-05-30-Speech-4-0672
lpv:speaker	lp:Marco Cappato2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-10-03--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I have asked to speak as I wanted to draw the Commission’s attention to a problem of legal basis in this report. The part of the amendment that we have just adopted provides for Member State exemptions in the processing of personal information. This second part, however, is intended to give an example of this exemption: data retention, or the blanket storage of personal data. We are dealing with a first pillar directive – the liberalisation of telecommunications – are we not? This addition seems totally inappropriate and outside our legal basis. In fact, only yesterday, the European Commission itself said it opposed an amendment tabled by Mrs Cederschiöld on behalf of the PPE-DE Group to cut the cost of data retention, precisely because it is outside the legal basis of the directive. If that was outside the legal basis, then this part must be so too. I would urge the Commission and the House to consider this."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph