Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-05-14-Speech-2-154"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020514.8.2-154"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, I too voted in favour of Mr Stenmarck’s report, which is very sound and makes clear the costs of all this taking to the road. We must highlight this issue and discuss it in the Convention and in this House.
I visit schools every week and, every time without exception, I am asked the question: why do you persist in moving between Brussels and Strasbourg? They know nothing about the EU, they perhaps do not know who President Prodi is, but they know that we move between Brussels and Strasbourg, and they think that that is insane. So do I.
We make ourselves a laughing-stock. We are like a travelling theatre company. Because we operate in different places, the Council and others can say that, yes, it is a travelling Parliament and does not have very much influence. The cost is enormous. The waste of resources for ourselves as MEPs is also considerable, and there are always problems in getting here, what with cancelled and delayed planes etc.
We need to make this beautiful building into something permanent. A Fatuzzo institute is a really excellent idea. It must have a significantly more important function than at present, however, so that, in the future, we can put our energies into the important political issues and not into travelling between Parliament’s two cities."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples