Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-05-14-Speech-2-151"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-05-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020514.8.2-151"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-05-14-Speech-2-1522
lpv:speaker	lp:Michiel van Hulten2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; PECH (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partij van de Arbeid (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; CONT (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; PES (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I too have voted in favour of the Stenmarck report, despite the fact that next year, a large proportion of the costs will once again be spent on buildings in Luxembourg, Brussels and Strasbourg. If the awful developments in the Netherlands over the past few weeks have taught us anything, it is that there is an enormous chasm between the citizens and their elected representatives. This does not only apply to the Netherlands, but also to France, for example. The European Parliament’s travelling circus is one of the symbols of waste and power politics to which citizens are opposed. Let us indeed persuade the Convention to call for an end to this mad situation. The European Parliament can organise its work more cheaply and more effectively by meeting in one place. This would send a strong message to the European citizens that we are taking their concerns seriously. This building could become a European university. I suggest we call it the Fatuzzo University."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph