Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-04-09-Speech-2-089"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-04-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020409.6.2-089"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-04-09-Speech-2-0902
lpv:speaker	lp:Ria Oomen-ruijten2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; EMPL (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Temporary committee on foot and mouth disease (2002-01-17--2002-12-17)3 unknown; Christen Democratisch Appèl (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, I should like to draw your attention to the following. In the Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy, the amendments adopted today – with thanks to the plenary – have been adopted by the European Commission. Yesterday, at the end of the debate, the European Commission said that it refused to be responsible for five or six amendments. The way in which this was done at the end of yesterday’s debate is objectionable in my view. Why? Because only the rapporteur is informed about the reasons why legally correct amendments are not adopted after all. I therefore take the view that the Commission should justify its behaviour. We cannot tolerate things being done one way one day and a different way the next for no apparent reason. Additionally, the Commission should, in my view, reconsider the amendments that have now been adopted in a letter, and all my fellow MEPs should receive a copy of what should actually have been said in the debate. Thank you very much."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph