Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-13-Speech-3-242"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-03-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020313.11.3-242"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-03-13-Speech-3-2432
lpv:speaker	lp:Olivier Dupuis2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Armenia, EU-Azerbaijan and EU-Georgia Parliamentary Cooperation Committees (2002-03-07--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; AFCO (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; NA (2001-10-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, south-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President-in-Office of the Council, it is now two years and six months since the second war in Chechnya began. Commissioner Poul Nielson has not yet been to Chechnya. My question is therefore this: in a matter of this kind – a humanitarian matter, an urgent matter – what time limit does the Council believe should be set for Commissioner Poul Nielsen to visit Chechnya? Should he go there within three years, four years or five years? And now for my second question: President Putin has appointed a negotiator, and President Maskhadov has appointed a negotiator. Would the Presidency of the Council be willing to receive the two negotiators, who are recognised by both parties and who are therefore fully legitimate negotiators? Could the Council meet with them?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph