Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-12-Speech-2-321"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2002-03-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Health rules concerning animal by-products2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20020312.13.2-321"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2002-03-12-Speech-2-3222
lpv:speaker	lp:Mikko Pesälä2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2002-02-07--2004-07-19)3 member; AGRI (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3 member; ELDR (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Suomen Keskusta (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; ECON (2002-01-17--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Commissioner, the matter under discussion is very intricate and complex, and is one that will have a very far-reaching effect on the food industry. For that reason, I wish to thank the rapporteur: we are grateful to you for your excellent work. In the main this report can be adopted. I would, however, like to draw attention to one point, and that is Amendment No 15. There are Member States where processing is on a very small scale. The requirement, therefore, that different categories of activity should have a separate building is unreasonable as far as these countries are concerned. For example, in my own country we have two plants, both of which already have clearly separate and properly supervised production lines. If we were to find ourselves in a situation where we had to construct separate buildings for one more separate production line that would be unreasonable considering the small volumes being processed. In my opinion the issues mentioned previously in the Council’s formulation have been taken proper account of, and I would hope the Council’s and the Commission’s position will enter into force with regard to this matter."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph