Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-03-12-Speech-2-225"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20020312.10.2-225"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
"Thank you for your answer, Commissioner. I am aware of the Marina study. I am very interested in its outcome. It will not report for a while yet, as you said. However, I should like to ask, based on that and the assessment you have already made, what further steps the Commissioner would recommend to control the continued emissions of radionuclides from Sellafield and La Hague. They are the largest man-made radioactive emissions and pollutants and do not pollute just EU Member States but migrate across the globe. Indeed, Norway has complained particularly about the Arctic fishing grounds being affected. What would you recommend as a result of all this assessment and forthcoming studies?
You recently visited Ireland – you have your Irish scarf on! You indicated that you are concerned about the emissions from Sellafield. We also have a recent RPII report, which I would recommend the Commission to study. You urged the Irish Government to pursue the issue at EU level instead of simply under the OSPAR. I have also made a complaint. I want to ask you to address that in depth. I have had to engage a lawyer to follow up the fact that this has not been dealt with responsibly over the last couple of years.
There has also been a recent departure of a Commission official, Mr Curry, to the board of BNFL. Has the Commission agreed that this is not a conflict of interest?"@en1
|
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples