Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2002-02-05-Speech-2-196"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20020205.10.2-196"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spoken text
"I would like to pick up on the Commissioner's last reply and I am delighted that he is talking about thorough impact assessment. I would like to put it to him that at the moment impact assessments that we receive attached to Commission proposals in many cases are not thoroughly done, they are not looking at the full implications, they are not necessarily independent. Would he agree with me that it is vital to have an interinstitutional arrangement for independent impact assessment so that when proposals come through this House and colleagues add burdens on business they are properly costed? Also, when the Council adds provisions to Commission proposals in common position, they should be properly costed too? Would he not share my view that this is the sort of bold proposal we want to see? I have to say that the proposals we have seen so far from the Commission on regulatory assessment are far too timid."@en1
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph