Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-12-17-Speech-1-052"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011217.3.1-052"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, the Laeken Declaration is punctuated by question marks: a sign of the ambiguity which currently exists in relation to the future of the European Union.
Needless to say, the new Convention cannot provide answers to all those questions. That is why, in my view, priority should be given to improving transparency and a clear demarcation of powers between the European Union and the Member States.
I was pleasantly surprised by the content of the questions concerning this latter point. It seems that there are no taboo subjects, if even the creeping transfer of powers in the direction of Brussels can be questioned.
I was also surprised, but not pleasantly, by the composition of the Convention’s praesidium: no fewer than twelve people are supposed to make up the total. I wonder, then, what the role of an ordinary Convention member is. Not a significant one, I fear. However, this jeopardises the quality of the proposals which this body makes. The Convention will be relying on quality. Otherwise, its ideas will simply be put away in a drawer and forgotten about."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples