Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-12-17-Speech-1-005"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Approval of the Minutes of the previous sitting2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011217.1.1-005"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-12-17-Speech-1-0062
lpv:speaker	lp:Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg2
lpv:spokenAs	member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovak Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3 unknown; GroenLinks (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I have a question concerning the complete report of the meetings: last Wednesday evening Vice-President Onesta announced that a vote would be held on Thursday morning on an urgent debate on the European arrest warrant. However, on Thursday morning, Mr Watson, chairman of the Committee on Citizens’ Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs, asked the plenary meeting to vote on an urgent debate on – I quote now from the complete report Confusion abounds. It proves in particular that last Thursday’s decision was taken too hastily and carelessly. Can you explain to me, on the basis of the complete report of the meetings, on which topics precisely we are to hold an urgent debate? And since we are on the subject of clarification, can you also assure me that the text on the European arrest warrant on which we could submit amendments up to 4 p.m. last Thursday is still the same text and was not changed last weekend? If that were the case, we would again be making incredible fools of ourselves today."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph