Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-12-11-Speech-2-172"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-12-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Green paper on the criminal protection of the Community's financial interests: A European prosecutor2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011211.9.2-172"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-12-11-Speech-2-1732
lpv:speaker	lp:Schreyer2
lpv:translated text	"Mr Mulder, there are of course various possibilities for that as well. One is that OLAF would continue in its present function of carrying out investigations under administrative law, in which case provision would of course have to be made for OLAF to present its results to the same Public Prosecutor, who would make use of the intelligence thus gathered. Another possibility would be for OLAF to itself take over enquiries rather than being limited to an examining role. We consciously refrained from giving that a prominent position in the current debate, but then it would have been said afterwards that we wanted to give OLAF a specific role. This is, as it were, an issue that has to be worked out once we have the ‘big picture’. I can only reiterate that we are not now dealing with competing conceptions, but with a White Paper in the drafting of which OLAF played a part. OLAF is always facing the difficulty of its having gathered evidence or intelligence and then having to wait to see whether a national state prosecutor's office will accept this material and work with it. If we had a European Financial Public Prosecutor, it would be a really positive step forward for OLAF's work."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph