Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-11-14-Speech-3-160"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-11-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011114.7.3-160"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-11-14-Speech-3-1612
lpv:speaker	lp:Carlo Fatuzzo2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Bulgaria Joint Parliamentary Committee (2001-09-06--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Partito Pensionati (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, what is this subsidiarity that is talked about so much in the European Union? Subsidiarity, you tell me, Mr President, means that one should act at a European level when that gives the greatest advantage and the greatest benefit to all the citizens of Europe. So how should we carry out scientific research in Europe? With fifteen different projects from fifteen different States, which tomorrow will be fifteen plus the twelve that are joining, which makes twenty-seven, or would it not be better to have a single research fund? Is it better to make a single decision on how to spend the money of all twenty-seven European Union Member States, the 15 current ones plus the 12 candidate countries, or to leave twenty-seven different chapters of the budget? We should decide to have a single European research fund."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph