Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-11-14-Speech-3-151"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011114.7.3-151"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Having attacked public rail transport, Mr Jarzembowski, the rapporteur, is now attacking port services. The logic behind this, which is still the same, is a direct result of the process of liberalising telecommunications, transport, energy and postal services. This involves placing the organising bodies, infrastructures and professionals carrying out public service tasks, often in a public context, under the yoke of the market.
Three hundred European Union ports and all port services such as freight handling, piloting, towage, mooring, embarkation and disembarkation services would be affected by this directive.
However, a recent opinion poll confirmed by the success of the European dockers’ strike of 6 November shows that these proposals meet with the mass rejection of port service workers. The long amendment war that took place within the Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism may have meant for now that competition will no longer be within ports but between them, but these results are not satisfactory. Moreover, because we demand that public service obligations regarding safety, regularity, continuity, quality, price and harmonisation with the system that is most favourable in terms of social protection for port workers and respect for the environment, be fulfilled, we have rejected the Jarzembowski report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples