Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-11-13-Speech-2-285"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-11-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011113.11.2-285"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-11-13-Speech-2-2862
lpv:speaker	lp:Bill Newton Dunn2
lpv:spoken text	"The third part of my question is slightly broader. I ask by what authority can the validity of a CE mark be challenged? The Commissioner has said in his first answer that it was not the Commission that would make a ruling and in his second supplementary he said that it would be the competent national authority. Is there any system of mutual recognition of a ruling by one national authority, or would it be necessary to challenge the use of a CE mark on something like a stun gun separately in each of the 15 Member States? Is there not some overall body that can say this is valid? It seems to be a very long-winded process if it has to be challenged 15 separate times."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Israel (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 vice-chair; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (2001-01-15--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Liberal Democrat Party (2000-11-29--2004-07-19)3 member; ELDR (2000-11-29--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Newton Dunn (ELDR )."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph