Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-11-13-Speech-2-259"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-11-13"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011113.11.2-259"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-11-13-Speech-2-2602
lpv:speaker	lp:Alonso José Puerta2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 vice-president; European Parliament (1999-07-20--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Question No 32 by Theresa Zabell (): On 21 August 2001, the EU was represented by Commissioner Reding at the meeting held in Tallinn, to decide on the location of the headquarters of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Does the Commission think that it might have been possible to avoid what happened in Tallinn? Was the choice of Montreal the result of the failure of the European candidates to present a united front? In 1999 the Commission submitted its support plan to combat doping. Why not transform this plan into a full-blown programme and provide it with the appropriate funding?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"President."1 "Subject: World Anti-Doping Agency"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph