Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-25-Speech-4-111"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011025.1.4-111"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
".
The existence and maintenance of an army is always justified by the argument that it was necessary in order to defend the freedom of the country's own territory and to discourage potential occupying forces. Because nobody likes to be occupied, the existence of such an army is accepted by a majority of people, albeit often with doubt or reluctance. Action by armies outside their own borders, on the other hand, is always rightly regarded as a form of aggression and imperialism. In recent years, there has been an offensive to justify the action of armies outside their own territory. This happened in Iraq and in Kosovo, and it is now happening in Afghanistan. When Mr Solana took up office, I heard him say that he knows of many places outside the territory of the EU where an army could be deployed. Mr Brok wants a decision on the operational readiness of a European ‘Rapid Reaction Force’ to be reached soon. I reject this part of his proposals, although I do share his views on the struggle against money laundering and against the international drugs trade, finding a humanitarian and political solution for Chechnya, strengthening the peace-building capacity of the United Nations and making aid for Macedonia dependent on the implementation of the agreed amendment to the constitution."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples