Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-25-Speech-4-091"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20011025.1.4-091"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:translated text |
"The reason why ‘the role of High Representative for the CFSP and that of the Commissioner responsible for external relations should be merged and assigned to a Commission Vice-President’ is that it will be difficult in the long term to maintain the double channels of command that apply to policy in the second pillar. It is problematic – from the points of view both of clarity and of the budget – for the EU to maintain two external relations administrations for the purpose of implementing foreign policy.
That does not however mean that we in any way support supranationalism within the areas of the second pillar. We do not therefore want the CFSP to be incorporated into the first, or Community, pillar.
The above position also applies to the relevant passage in paragraph 3 of the report on the progress made in implementing the Common Foreign and Security Policy (Rapporteur: Mr Brok)."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples