Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-23-Speech-2-075"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-10-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Exposure of workers to risks arising from physical agents2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011023.5.2-075"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-10-23-Speech-2-0762
lpv:speaker	lp:Theodorus J.J. Bouwman2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Romania Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-12-16--2002-01-14)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3,3 substitute; EMPL (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 member; G/EFA (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 unknown; GroenLinks (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, in my opinion, the rapporteur has done sterling work. I have been active in an advisory role vis-à-vis works councils, trade unions and industry concerning conditions at work, among other things. I have observed that, for some fifteen years, we in the Netherlands – but that also applies to other Member States in terms of best practices – have been working with the ISO Standard 2631, as recommended and followed by Mrs Thorning-Schmidt. Only at the end did we decide to adopt the amendment by Mrs Hermange. I actually agree that we should not simply consider the views of industry. There are also other angles to be considered. For example, the trade unions have stated that this is not simply a matter of exposure from a health perspective, but also a matter of symptoms of fatigue, for example. Consequently, the standard should, from the point of view of safety – or, rather, the lack of this – actually be stricter than is now the case. I have not yet heard this aspect mentioned here, and it should actually help us find a happy medium."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph