Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-22-Speech-1-078"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-10-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European judicial area/SIS II2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011022.5.1-078"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-10-22-Speech-1-0792
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilka Schröder2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EUL/NGL (2001-09-28--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Industry, External Trade, Research and Energy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (1999-09-28--2002-01-14)3 unknown; parteilos (2000-09-01--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, what is the Schengen Information System meant to achieve? It aims to improve police cooperation in criminal law matters, to harmonise immigration and visa policy and to monitor the free movement of persons. This monitoring, though, is targeted not least at migrants, who find it impossible or virtually impossible to travel to the EU legally, and the great majority of whom are fleeing situations that the EU may well not have created on its own but has substantially helped to bring about. As many people have already mentioned today, the system is directed against those of the EU's citizens who incur its displeasure by wanting, for example, at a summit meeting, to express their disapproval of an EU policy which is characterised by lockouts and the capitalisation of essential areas of life. It is becoming clear what this update of the Schengen Information System amounts to. On the one hand, it is about the efficient use of the surveillance which technology and geography make possible. At the same time, the EU wants the mere existence of these possibilities to mean that use is actually made of them. Even the apparently technical changes in these proposals are also about improving the existing surveillance structure, and so this improvement needs to be financed. And here I must disagree with Mr Turco and say that, in my judgment, nothing whatever in this project would be changed even by democratic control. Seeing this from the Left, I believe this proposal cannot be supported. Basic freedoms perform quite different functions in capitalism. From a quite pragmatic point of view, though, they do guarantee the citizen a minimum of protection from the State. It so happens, in the present situation, that most restrictions on basic rights…."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President cut the speaker off)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph