Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-03-Speech-3-296"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-10-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011003.8.3-296"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-10-03-Speech-3-2972
lpv:speaker	lp:Neyts-Uyttebroeck2
lpv:translated text	". Unless the interpreters have omitted some of what I said, which would surprise me, I think that I have given a general answer. My personal views on the family are of no relevance at all to the debate that we are having. I have the greatest respect for the family, but that has no relevance to the debate underway here. The question is what is the position of Member States, since it is the Member States who must unanimously adopt and define their position regarding the work of the United Nations General Assembly on Children. I have given you some information on this issue. I stated that Member States are using the same terminology as that used at the United Nations global conferences, in other words at the conferences in Cairo, Peking and Copenhagen. This is a political indication of the way in which Member States are working to define a unanimous position concerning the United Nations conference on Children."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph