Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-10-03-Speech-3-290"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-10-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Council)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20011003.8.3-290"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-10-03-Speech-3-2912
lpv:speaker	lp:Lennart Sacrédeus2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFCO (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Kristdemokraterna (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 vice-chair; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees and delegations for relations with Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova (1999-10-07--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"I would like to express my thanks for the reply, but I should nonetheless like to say that, in all the important comments made towards the end of your reply, you did not actually mention the family among those initiatives you emphasised as being in the best interests of the child. Was this pure coincidence? In Paragraph 1 of the European Parliament resolution of 5 July 2001 on the EU positions at the UN General Assembly Special Session on Children, we state the following: ‘family is the fundamental unit of society and holds the primary responsibility for the protection, upbringing and development of children’. In other words, it says ‘family’, not ‘family in its various forms’. How do you interpret the position of the European Parliament, and how do you value a mother and a father supporting their children in their development? Why has the EU acted in a way which means that the concept of family has in fact been changed?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph