Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-05-Speech-3-380"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Data protection in electronic communications (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010905.11.3-380"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-09-05-Speech-3-3812
lpv:speaker	lp:Marco Cappato2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Member States of ASEAN, South-east Asia and the Republic of Korea (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 member; TGI (1999-07-20--2001-10-02)3 member; Committee on Citizens' Freedoms and Rights, Justice and Home Affairs (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Lista Emma Bonino (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; EMPL (2000-01-17--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, with regard to the procedure followed in the approval of my report, Mr Van Velzen has made reference to a possible violation of procedure. I ask the presidency to clarify this point for tomorrow’s debate, because I do not want there to be this ambiguity. If the procedure has been violated, the work in violation of the procedure should be cancelled; if the procedure has been respected, it has been respected. I believe this is the least we owe to the House. Personally, as rapporteur of the committee with competence in the matter, I have never been consulted by any of the other committees; had it been an ‘enhanced Hughes procedure’ – which it is not – I would have had to be consulted. However it may be – I am not an expert on procedure – and I ask that a check be made as to whether the procedures were violated. Results in violation of the procedures should be cancelled."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph