Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-05-Speech-3-212"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20010905.5.3-212"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:spokenAs
lpv:translated text
". A few years ago, the existence of ECHELON was still emphatically denied. After all, the organisation was secret, and the objective of such secrecy is to prevent the people from knowing of its existence. Such a state of affairs is, of course, completely at odds with democratic decision making, transparency, public order and the protection of individuals. It is a major step forward that it is now openly being admitted that an EU Member State has been working with the United States, Australia and New Zealand on worldwide espionage for a long time, something which may well adversely affect people, organisations and businesses within the EU. However, the report does not draw any worthwhile conclusions from this. It accepts that as a result of the outcome of the Second World War, with the United States playing a dominant role in Western Europe, such agreements were made and that these have persisted through time. The conclusion should be that the United Kingdom should choose between membership with the EU and that of ECHELON, that cooperation with this system on the part of citizens of EU Member States will be penalised, that similar espionage systems of other Member States will be abandoned and that telephone traffic will no longer be tapped. The passive stance of a two-thirds majority of this Parliament is sanctioning a Europe of snoopers. I do not agree with this."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz
3http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/spokenAs.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph