Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-05-Speech-3-135"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-09-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010905.5.3-135"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-09-05-Speech-3-1362
lpv:speaker	lp:Michl Ebner2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AGRI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 substitute; BUDG (2000-11-15--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Südtiroler Volkspartei (Partito popolare sudtirolese) (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-09-01--2002-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Slovenia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-06)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, allow me to explain my vote on the Swoboda report. Although the problem of transalpine traffic to which Mr Swoboda refers in his report primarily affects Austria, it also relates to the entire Brenner corridor. That is where we have the problem, which derives from the fact that the proposal and the ideas presented by the Commission lose a very great deal of credibility as far as the area between Verona and Munich is concerned by seeking to amend a Protocol to the Act of Accession unilaterally. We are in favour of tighter ecological restrictions. We are in favour of measures if they respect the interests and equal rights of the people and companies that operate in the area in question. But it is absolutely imperative that contractual law be upheld, both now and in the future."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph