Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-04-Speech-2-044"

PredicateValue (sorted: default)
rdf:type
dcterms:Date
dcterms:Is Part Of
dcterms:Language
lpv:document identification number
"en.20010904.2.2-044"2
lpv:hasSubsequent
lpv:speaker
lpv:translated text
". Madam President, Commissioner, ladies and gentlemen, first of all, I would like to thank all the speakers who have taken part in this debate, not only to explain and clarify their positions, but also to express their feelings and emotion regarding the tragic situation in the Middle East, and, of course, the appalling events of yesterday. Ladies and gentlemen, I understand only too well how tempting it is, when faced with the seemingly endless cycle of acts of violence and violent retaliation, to give in firstly to our emotions, whether positive or negative. This is a very human response and if we did not react in such a way, we might wonder, in fact, whether we are human. I believe, however, that if we want to help find a solution, we must control these emotions and overcome them. We must also be able to control our frustration – and God only knows how frustrated we are by this process, where we take one step forward and two steps back, and sometimes even two steps forward and three steps back. We must always begin again, pick up the pieces, maintain contact with both parties and use the carrot and stick approach – if you will forgive me using such a crude expression – as circumstances require. This is a process to which, I believe, all the bodies of the European Union, including the Presidency, of course, are devoted, in the full knowledge that by continuously working hard to try to safeguard opportunities for a solution, there is a great danger that neither side will be satisfied. I would like to endorse the comments of those Members who have reiterated that the European Union’s role in a region of the world so close to our own is today much more important than it was several years ago. However, very many of you have also said that a solution cannot be found without much more active and dynamic support than is currently being given by the US administration and other bodies or other governments. Lastly, and to sum up, Madam President, I would nevertheless like to say to those who have criticised the concept of impartiality, as they may rightfully do so, of course, that by maintaining a position of equal distance between both parties does not mean we believe that their circumstances are identical. To use the English expression, and these will be my closing words"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata
"‘equidistance is not equalising the parties involved.’"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

1http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/English.ttl.gz
2http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/rdf/Events_and_structure.ttl.gz

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph