Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-09-03-Speech-1-107"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-09-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European works council2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010903.7.1-107"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-09-03-Speech-1-1082
lpv:speaker	lp:Arlette Laguiller2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Lutte ouvrière (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Development and Cooperation (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I shall not vote against the report, for the sole reason that some trade unions are hoping that it will be adopted, whatever my views may be on their policy. Even so, however, I shall not give my approval of the report. In fact, in order to counteract a limited increase in the rights of European works councils, the report calls upon us to approve competition rules and the confidentiality of information. The report also stresses that the role awaiting the councils is that of reducing the risk of conflict which may, the report claims, prove to be a factor in a company’s success, or rather, in an employer’s success. In France, it is very clear that the final decision on all issues that affect workers’ lives is made by employers. Works councils have been rendered powerless, such as when Moulinex, Aventis, Danone and many other companies made unacceptable redundancies, or they are tricked into approving the employer’s decisions, or even into nominating the victims of redundancies, as was the case at AOM-Air Liberté. Therefore, the only right which would, in truth, be a right for workers would be the right to employment, or a ban on redundancies, in other words, at least in companies that are making profits."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph