Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-05-Speech-4-070"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-07-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010705.4.4-070"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-07-05-Speech-4-0712
lpv:speaker	lp:Isabelle Caullery2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegations to the parliamentary cooperation committees and delegations for relations with Ukraine, Belarus and Moldova (1999-09-30--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Rassemblement pour la France (1999-07-20--2003-01-20)3 substitute; ECON (2000-03-13--2002-01-14)3 member; CONT (2000-03-13--2002-01-14)3 member; UEN (2000-09-21--2004-07-19)3
lpv:translated text	"Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget No 3, submitted to us in Mrs Haug’s report, is essentially about changes to OLAF and European Commission staff. As regards the Anti-Fraud Office, the amendment tabled by the Committee on Budgets, in agreement with the Committee on Budgetary Control, changes the distribution between permanent posts and temporary posts in a way we find commendable and, as a whole, this Draft Supplementary and Amending Budget does not call for any special comment. Supplementary and Amending Budget No 4 deals primarily with the balance for the financial year 2000, and also provides for a strengthening of the supplementary payment appropriations for the Western Balkans from the 2000 balance, raising them from EUR 350 million to EUR 450 million, or EUR 70 million more for the Balkans and an additional EUR 30 million for supplementary financial assistance for FRY. The rapporteur agrees to the ‘revenue’ side of this Supplementary and Amending Budget, in other words the reimbursement, which we support, of EUR 7.5 billion arising from the 2000 surplus to the Member States. However, the Union for Europe of the Nations Group cannot join the rapporteur in condemning the fact that the European Parliament has no say in the ‘revenue’ section of the budget. Mrs Haug’s other report, on the situation concerning the European Union's own resources in 2001, also reopens the debate on increasing revenue, taking the view that the European Union should depend less and less on payments from the Member States, and that the own resources system should be changed so as to achieve financial autonomy. The resolution therefore states that the purpose of the reform should be to provide Europe with an ‘autonomous source of revenue’, and it supports the establishment of a direct European tax, at the same time demanding full association of the European Parliament in the budgetary procedure, in particular as regards revenue. The French delegation of the Union for Europe of the Nations Group is opposed to all these inappropriate proposals, which in any case infringe the Treaty."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Explanation of vote shortened pursuant to Rule 137 of the Rules of Procedure)"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph