Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-04-Speech-3-368"

Predicate	Value (sorted: none)
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Lutte ouvrière (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Switzerland, Iceland and Norway (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Erika"1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Ievoli Sun"1
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-07-04-Speech-3-3692
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Coastal zone management in Europe2
dcterms:Date	"2001-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010704.12.3-368"2
lpv:speaker	lp:Chantal Cauquil2
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, coastal management which is not only integrated but planned, both in Europe and in every continent, is one of the paramount necessities for the future of humanity. It is impossible to deal with this issue within the narrow context of the existing Member States. This is an area in which decisions could be necessary and legitimate at the level of a whole continent, or even of the entire planet. However, this is also an area in which the European institutions have least power, although they are very fond of finicky regulations in other areas where centralisation is not required. In this way they demonstrate that they do not represent an authority which imposes its will on national States, each with its particularisms and selfish interests, but rather that they are the result of those interests. The European institutions, like the national States, are in the service of the private interests of the major industrial and financial groups. They are incapable of imposing on those groups the policies which are of utmost importance to society as a whole, and there is a real risk that future generations will die as a result. The solving of major ecological problems is totally incompatible with the private ownership of the major means of production and the use of those means with the exclusive aim of making a profit. The cases involving the and the were a good illustration of the extent to which private interests are opposed to collective interests. In these circumstances, to vote in favour of a strategy for integrated coastal zone management would be pure hypocrisy. We shall be abstaining from the vote."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph