Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-04-Speech-3-114"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-07-04"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010704.3.3-114"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-07-04-Speech-3-1152
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Women's Rights and Equal Opportunities (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Partido Comunista Português (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; AGRI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EUL/NGL (1999-07-20--2002-03-05)3
lpv:translated text	". The controversy surrounding the conciliation process for this proposal for a directive, clearly visible in the outcome of Parliament’s vote – it was rejected, since the vote was tied – demonstrated that two ideas with various practical differences were involved in the process of harmonising legislation on takeover bids. Although some slight progress was made during the conciliation process on protecting shareholders who do not have control of the company and on adopting some regulations on making the information of workers mandatory, the situation still fails to safeguard all aspects of workers’ and minority shareholders’ ability to take action. Lastly, although the position arising from conciliation might be of benefit to Portugal, given that Portuguese companies are a potential target and an easy one for cross-border takeovers, there are other, more appropriate ways of protecting national interests. Hence our abstention from voting."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph