Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-03-Speech-2-195"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010703.9.2-195"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:translated text |
".
I would like to add that this complaint is insignificant compared to the original complaint submitted to the Commission. In fact, the plaintiff has constantly made further complaints as the project for the theme park has progressed. The Commission received 18 successive letters from the plaintiff in relation to the project. This is a complicated issue, which has also given rise to a great deal of correspondence between the Commission and the Spanish authorities, which is one of the reasons for the amount of time which has passed since this matter first came to light.
In answer to Mr Berenguer Fuster, I mentioned why the Commission opened proceedings so as to provide Parliament with a more detailed framework. Perhaps I should mention the other points, namely those in which the plaintiff alleges that the grounds where the park is built were purchased cheaply, that some of the park’s costs were met by the regional authorities, that the principle of the private investor was not respected, that loans were granted to benefit the park, that injections of capital have been given to the park and that funding for training and direct regional funding has been provided."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples