Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-07-03-Speech-2-187"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-07-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010703.9.2-187"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-07-03-Speech-2-1882
lpv:speaker	lp:Per Stenmarck2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-10-07--2002-01-14)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-07)3 unknown; Moderata samlingspartiet (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Estonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-07--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I first want to thank the Commissioner for his reply. When, as in this case, the issue is a complaint submitted to the Commission in 1996, i.e. five years ago, there is really only one acceptable course of action, namely for the Commission immediately to decide on its position. This has not been promised by the Commission, which is why I cannot say that I am satisfied with the reply. It is an issue of fundamental significance that excessive fees have been charged by a port which, it has been has a dominant position. I would like to emphasise that I have no view on whether this is right or wrong, but all parties are waiting for the Commission’s decision and all parties are very much dependent on the Commission’ decision. I think it is unreasonable for it to take over five years for the Commission to make a decision. I would therefore put the question to the Commission: When is a final decision likely to be forthcoming?"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"alleged"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph