Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-06-14-Speech-4-051"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-06-14"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010614.3.4-051"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-06-14-Speech-4-0522
lpv:speaker	lp:Philip Bushill-matthews2
lpv:spoken text	". The UK Conservative Delegation voted against the Hughes amendments for the reasons set out in my speech in the debate. However, we voted in favour of my Amendment No 23, calling for a thorough Business Impact Assessment to be carried out and published within three years of the adoption of this Directive. We did this in spite of the frankly outrageous comment by Commissioner Palacio at the end of the debate yesterday that ‘of course’ she could not accept this amendment as it would be an unreasonable administrative burden! The Hughes amendments, if adopted by Council, would place further burdens on the self-employed and on SMEs. It is therefore particularly important that the impact on such businesses is clearly identified and thoroughly assessed at an early stage, so that further revision of the Directive can be considered."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries and the Gulf (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3 member; EMPL (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; EPP-ED (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Conservative and Unionist Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Bushill-Matthews (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph