Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-06-12-Speech-2-243"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010612.12.2-243"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Mr Sjöstedt’s question refers to the hypothetical recording of information in the Schengen Information System (SIS).
Let me point out that in accordance with Article 105 of the Convention implementing the Schengen Agreement, responsibility lies exclusively with the Contracting Parties with regard to ensuring that reports entered into SIS are correct, up to date and legal.
In accordance with Article 104, the law applying to reports will be the national law of the reporting Contracting Party. It should also be borne in mind that in Sweden, as in other Member States which have adopted the Schengen Agreement, there is an authority with responsibility for independent monitoring of the national Schengen Information System.
Anyone is entitled to demand that the monitoring authority check the reports in SIS which concern them and the way this information is used. This check must be carried out in accordance with Swedish law.
Let me take off my Presidency hat just for a while and put on my Swedish hat and inform Mr Sjöstedt that, for safety’s sake, I asked the same question as Mr Sjöstedt about whether any people were registered in SIS by the Swedish authorities because they took part in the demonstration in Malmö or because they are critical of the EU. A check revealed the answer to both these questions to be an unequivocal no."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples