Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-06-12-Speech-2-128"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010612.6.2-128"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
".
Those recitals in the draft which state that there is a need to take strong measures to halt trafficking in human beings, and the references to the UN texts, appear to us to be broadly correct. Of course, the concept of labour exploitation could be expanded (the references are those of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, which are too restrictive).
The main danger lies in confusing trafficking in human beings with immigration and attempting to treat the two as one and the same thing. This is why we supported the amendments which point out that the campaign to stop trafficking in human beings must not be used to repress unauthorised immigrants, and those which refer to the right to reside for all victims. We also voted in favour of those amendments which seek to classify as an offence what was originally called an infringement, in view of what trafficking in human beings means in terms of exploitation, humiliation, and physical and mental violence.
Finally, we should like to make it clear that our positive vote on this proposed framework decision in no way means that we believe that the various European systems of cooperation between police forces and judicial systems currently in use are acceptable or legitimate."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples