Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-06-12-Speech-2-118"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-06-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010612.6.2-118"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-06-12-Speech-2-1192
lpv:speaker	lp:Gunilla Carlsson2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-07)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Poland Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-10-08--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Foreign Affairs, Human Rights, Common Security and Defence Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Moderata samlingspartiet (1999-07-20--2002-09-30)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Latvia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-05-18--2002-01-14)3 substitute; EMPL (2000-05-17--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	"I merely wish to ask whether the written explanations of vote should not be taken first. As I understand it, one must be present in the chamber even when submitting a written explanation of vote. Or have these rules been changed again? My delegation has remained as we wish to submit a written explanation. We would like this to be registered and then we would like to be able to leave. It would therefore be easier if we took the written explanations first. I would like some clarification: Does one need to remain in the chamber if one wishes to submit a written explanation and have it approved, or not?"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph