Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-17-Speech-4-088"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-05-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010517.5.4-088"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-05-17-Speech-4-0892
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Committee on Culture, Youth, Education, the Media and Sport (2000-11-16--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (1999-11-11--2002-01-14)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 unknown; Front national (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Legal Affairs and the Internal Market (2000-11-16--2002-01-14)3 member; TGI (1999-07-20--2001-10-02)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I realised just now that this question, which was set aside by the vote in this House yesterday, pursuant to Rule 143, and removed from the agenda by a motion of inadmissibility, had been reintroduced pursuant to Rule 111(2). Now Rule 111(2), explicitly states that the agenda can be altered by application of Rule 143, which has taken place, or on a proposal from the President, in other words you, Madam President. The word ‘or’, however, clearly denotes, in law, an alternative. In other words, if the agenda was altered by application of Rule 143, it cannot be altered again, quite obviously, by a proposal from the President. That is the reason why I have the strongest reservations about the legality of the vote which is about to take place, with many Members prevented from taking part in the debate. I think the Court of Justice should rule on this matter and I have no doubt that once again, Madam President, it will, sadly, reveal your rather light approach to your responsibilities."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph