Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-16-Speech-3-268"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010516.10.3-268"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"I believe that a procedure such as Mr Sjöstedt describes is out of the question. I note first of all that the introduction to the Act that has been agreed upon expressly states that it is neither the aim nor the effect of the Regulation to change national legislation concerning public access to documents.
Secondly, Mr Sjöstedt refers to the loyalty principle. This is not new. We have been living the whole time with what is known as the loyalty principle, as described in Article 10 of the EC Treaty. It has not been changed in relation to the agreement made here and approved by Parliament at the beginning of this month.
I want to emphasise that the consultation procedure being introduced through Article 5 into the new Act is only advisory. If we talk about the situation in Sweden, the fact that, in order to be able to make a correct assessment of damage, Swedish authorities may need to consult the institutions when applying the rules concerning foreign secrecy is not in itself anything new. That is a familiar fact of Swedish legislation, and the new Act does not change anything in that regard."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples