Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-16-Speech-3-206"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010516.7.3-206"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, in this debate on a point of order the term ‘nationalists’ has been used, which does no justice to the arguments of the aggrieved parties. My impression is that a number of other matters are involved, the question whether it is legitimate to distribute taxpayers’ money to parties and through government impose rules on parties that strengthen the distrust of citizens of what they see as a political elite. That is a problem. Parties should be bottom-up and not top-down organisations. Real parties do not emerge because the structures of a state require the organisation of a competitive struggle at election time but because there are people with common ideas, interests and activities. That is why it is rather artificial, at a moment when there is no European public opinion, to create parties from above in a forced way. I therefore ask for understanding of the objections which are something other than nationalism and I think that it mainly revolves around the question whether the European Union has the power to do such a thing, or whether it does not have the power, which is why Mr Krarup has already indicated that in that respect we are now on thin ice. I think that if such a measure were ever to be passed, we should all have to be certain that it does not conflict with previously agreed European rules."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples