Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-15-Speech-2-334"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010515.13.2-334"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Mr President, first of all, I should like to thank the rapporteurs warmly for the huge amount of work they have done. Secondly, I should like to echo what Mr Jarzembowski said. I believe that there is a great deal of truth in it. It is all about the procedure at the moment. I am increasingly being driven to distraction with regard to the way in which we are time and time again pushed into codecisions. I would want things to move faster, and that should be possible. In fact, everyone – whether it be the IMO or the Commission – is convinced that such a voyage data recorder, for example, is useful. Ultimately, we have very difficult procedures behind us, involving Mr Gayssot
. In my opinion, we should be able to achieve results faster one way or another, not just now, but also in future. That is one thing. Secondly, I believe we are right in retrieving the VDR by means of an amendment and, thirdly, it is even more important specifically to consider the evaluation of port State control, for that is what matters. That also includes the quality of that Port State control; not just the technical side of things, but also the human factor, such as the way in which the crew is set up. I have a good mind, pending the second Erika package, to ask again for extra consideration to be given particularly to the crew, the number of crew, the nature of the crew, etc. I believe we simply need to draft another proposal in this connection, for we are not adequately covering that area, and the public will be at a loss to understand why that is."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples