Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-03-Speech-4-089"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-05-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Vote2
dcterms:Language	"nl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010503.5.4-089"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-05-03-Speech-4-0902
lpv:speaker	lp:Erik Meijer2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Socialistische Partij (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (1999-10-13--2004-07-19)3 member; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Slovak Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (1999-09-29--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Temporary committee on human genetics and other new technologies in modern medicine (2000-12-13--2001-11-29)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Czech Republic Joint Parliamentary Committee (2000-11-09--2002-01-14)3 substitute; Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Consumer Policy (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". The extent of disclosure of information is not determined by the quantity of unimportant or non-controversial information made available on the Internet. What is at issue is precisely documents, the authors and customers of which are able decide that their content of even their existence is kept secret. We may adopt this proposal, but we are still a long way away from disclosure as it is known in the Netherlands and Scandinavia. The currently proposed form of restricted disclosure could even be a means of systematically protecting documents from priers, which are now hardly accessible to society. Those in favour of the compromise do not seem too keen either, but they still call on everyone to vote for the proposal. Their main arguments are that the outcome without the compromise would be even worse, and that they expect that something better will come up after the 2004 evaluation. Those opposing disclosure have not spoken out in the debate at all, but without such opponents, difficult negotiations behind the scenes would not have been necessary and we would have been able to vote on a better outcome today. Incorrect and hasty preparations have created a situation in which the moderate advocates of disclosure are voting in favour and the radical advocates are being forced to vote against."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph