Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-05-02-Speech-3-115"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20010502.7.3-115"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spoken text |
"I rise because a damaging accusation was made that somehow we have violated the treaties by excluding smaller groups from discussions and negotiations and it is extremely important to correct this. The debate and vote on the first draft report was held on 16 November 2000. The rapporteurs were given a clear mandate by Parliament for discussion with the Council. The European Parliament's Conference of Presidents also gave their clear political support. The mandate given under Rule 69 of the Rules of Procedure was, and I quote, "to table amendments seeking to reach a compromise", in order to adopt the Regulation in a single reading and within the date set in the Treaty to implement Article 255.
The series of trialogue meetings, discussions between the Council, the Commission and Parliament, took place from January to March 2001. All, and I repeat all, the various versions of the compromise amendments were discussed in the LIBE Committee and following the trialogue meetings. The process has been considerably more transparent than the conciliation process and these compromise amendments were agreed on 25 April in the LIBE Committee. At no time has any group, or any individual, been prevented from putting down amendments to put their influence into the procedure. Things move on. This Union has moved on. Post Nice, we have a security policy. It is right that we operate properly and responsibly."@en1
|
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples