Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-05-Speech-4-122"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010405.6.4-122"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-05-Speech-4-1232
lpv:speaker	lp:James Nicholson2
lpv:spoken text	". – I find myself with some difficulty in supporting this proposal as it stands. While I have changed my mind about vaccination in an emergency, I have some problem with the view that it can be used without the eventual slaughter of those animals vaccinated. It is clear to me that to adopt such a policy would not be in the best long-term interest of the European export industry. The Standing Veterinary Committee makes it clear that no vaccine has yet been developed that would differentiate between vaccinated and non-vaccinated animals. I agree that we should encourage the development of new vaccines that would give us more flexibility, better tracing and would ensure that we could continue to export to other countries, and we should develop improved controls on imports into anywhere in the EU, for it is clear we imported foot-and-mouth in the UK illegally."@en1
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AGRI (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3,3 unknown; Ulster Unionist Party (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3,3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (2000-02-02--2002-01-14)3,3 chair; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (1999-10-12--2002-03-07)3,3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (1999-07-22--2002-01-14)3,3 member; PECH (1999-09-13--2002-01-14)3,3
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Nicholson (PPE-DE ),"1 "in writing"1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph