Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-05-Speech-4-116"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:VOTE2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010405.6.4-116"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-05-Speech-4-1172
lpv:speaker	lp:Markus Ferber2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2000-04-03--2004-07-19)3 unknown; Christlich-Soziale Union in Bayern e.V. (1999-07-20--2004-07-19)3 substitute; Committee on Regional Policy, Transport and Tourism (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; BUDG (1999-07-21--2002-01-14)3 member; Delegation to the European Economic Area Joint Parliamentary Committee (EEA) (1999-10-06--2002-01-14)3
lpv:translated text	". In view of the fact that foot-and-mouth has broken out in at least four Member States, the foot-and-mouth vaccine which was adopted throughout Europe in 1991 must be screened and even abandoned. Politicians such as the German Agriculture Minister, Renate Künast, who reject foot-and-mouth vaccination must reconsider. The reasons for a ban that were valid then do not apply today, since improved foot-and-mouth vaccines have been introduced. Nonetheless, research into the development and manufacture of foot-and-mouth vaccines must continue. In particular, the following vaccinations should be authorised by the European Commission: emergency vaccinations (ring vaccinations) in regions hit by foot-and-mouth and in zones which are contiguous to regions hit by foot-and-mouth and for zoo animals."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph