Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2001-04-03-Speech-2-249"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2001-04-03"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20010403.10.2-249"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2001-04-03-Speech-2-2502
lpv:speaker	lp:Vitorino.2
lpv:translated text	". I have the greatest respect for your opinion, but my point of view is as follows: a Danish law, as stated in your question does not contravene the Schengen acquis. Incidentally, I do not understand how Protocol 5 can be invoked – there is no contradiction between the decision of the Schengen Executive Committee and the free and sovereign decision of the Kingdom of Denmark. This does not constitute an exception, but rather a guarantee for the uniform implementation of the rule."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph